Papua Is Part of Indonesia According to the UN Resolution of 1969

Papua Is Part of Indonesia According to the UN Resolution of 1969

The statement of Papua is part of the Homeland not just a speech, but a reality. Moreover, from the historical point of view, it would be clear that Papua is a body of indigenous peoples since Papua's entry has been approved by the United Nations (UN)

The long history of the People's Opposition (Pepera) meeting was held from July 24 to August 1969. Initially the UN sent 50 of its staff to Papua, but later reduced it to half, with a total of only 16 including administrative staff.

The UN has agreed to limit the number of its officials so that they are watching over Pepera in small numbers. So the notion of UN as a world organization under pressure from Indonesia is incorrect. The task of monitoring the Pepera began on August 23, 1968.

Implementation of Pepera is conducted in 8 Regions namely Jayawijaya, Merauke, Paniai, Fakfak, Sorong, Biak, Manokwari and Jayapura. Which was attended by 1026 members of the House of Representatives (DMP), representing the total population of Papua which at that time totaled 809,327 people.

The DMP is made up of 400 people representing the traditional elements (Chiefs / Customs), 360 people representing the area of ​​fiber 266 people representing elements of political organizations and other community organizations. The results of the Pepera held in the 8 Regions of West Irian (Papua) selected and determined that Papua was an absolute part of the NRI.

The results were then agreed and approved by the signing of a signature for all present at the meeting. According to de Facto the people of Papua choose to integrate with this area of ​​NRI. The UN Resolution No. 2504 at the November 19, 1969 General Assembly stated that if 82 countries agreed, there were 30 abstains and none. This shows that the International world has recognized the legitimacy of the 1969 issue of Pepper.

The UN seems to have taken into account the consequences of democratic reasoning for the pros and cons of this Pepera outcome. Opinions of those who accept decisions are also opposed to decisions. The lawsuit over the legitimacy of Pepera by the OPM was judged to be a misdemeanor by trying to find a historical gap used in its interests.

The 1969 elections were implemented according to the conditions of the region and the development of the community. Which is not possible to do “one man, one vote”. In view of this as a defect or defect, in fact the UN has adopted Pepera's legitimacy through resolution No. 2504.

As such, it should set UN resolutions to acknowledge that Pepera's results are considered legitimate documents since Pepera was implemented. Even with the representative system, however, the results of Pepera were well received as a final decision.